CASE

Download full text EN

Case Name

XK v JY [2023] EWHC 2996

INCADAT reference

HC/E/UKe 1699

Court

Country

UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES

Name

High Court of Justice, Family Division

Level

First Instance

Judge(s)

Mrs Justice Morgan

States involved

Requesting State

SLOVAKIA

Requested State

UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES

Decision

Date

23 November 2023

Status

Final

Grounds

Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

Order

Return ordered

HC article(s) Considered

13(1)(b)

HC article(s) Relied Upon

13(1)(b)

Other provisions

-

Authorities | Cases referred to

In re E (Children) (Abduction Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27; Re S (Abduction : Article 13 (b) Defence) [2012] UKSC 10; KG v JH/ Re IG [2021] EWCA Civ 1123; Re A (Children)(Abduction: Article 13b) [2021] EWCA Civ 939; PvO [2023]EWHC 2128; Re H (Children) (Child Abduction: Grave Risk) [2003] EWCA Civ 355; G v D (Art. 13 (b):Absence of Protective Measures) [2020] EWHC 1476 (Fam); F v M [2008] 2 FLR 1263

Published in

-

SUMMARY

Summary available in EN

Facts

The parents started their relationship in 2017 and had a child later that year (age 5 at the time of the hearing). The parents and child were all Slovakian nationals. 

In March 2023 the Mother took the child to the UK without the knowledge or consent of the Father.

The Father filed an application under the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention for the return of the child to Slovakia.

The Mother argued that she had suffered abuse from the Father and relied upon the Article 13(1)(b) exception to return. The Father denied the allegations. 

Ruling

Return ordered. Whilst the Mother established that there was a grave risk of harm to the child within the meaning of Article 13(1)(b), the protective measures available in Slovakia and the undertakings offered by the Father were more than sufficient to protect him.

Grounds

Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

The seriousness of the Mother’s allegations meant that, were the child to be returned to Slovakia, he would be placed at grave risk of psychological harm and put in a situation which would properly be characterised as intolerable.

However, the Court was satisfied that undertakings by the Father and the protective measures available in Slovakia would be adequate to protect the child in the mother’s care whilst decisions were made for him.