AFFAIRE

Télécharger le texte complet EN

Nom de l'affaire

XK v JY [2023] EWHC 2996

Référence INCADAT

HC/E/UKe 1699

Juridiction

Pays

Royaume-Uni - Angleterre et Pays de Galles

Degré

Première instance

États concernés

État requérant

Slovaquie

État requis

Royaume-Uni - Angleterre et Pays de Galles

Décision

Date

23 November 2023

Statut

Définitif

Motifs

Risque grave - art. 13(1)(b)

Décision

Retour ordonné

Article(s) de la Convention visé(s)

13(1)(b)

Article(s) de la Convention visé(s) par le dispositif

13(1)(b)

Autres dispositions

-

Jurisprudence | Affaires invoquées

-

Publiée dans

-

RÉSUMÉ

Résumé disponible en EN

Facts

The parents started their relationship in 2017 and had a child later that year (age 5 at the time of the hearing). The parents and child were all Slovakian nationals. 

In March 2023 the Mother took the child to the UK without the knowledge or consent of the Father.

The Father filed an application under the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention for the return of the child to Slovakia.

The Mother argued that she had suffered abuse from the Father and relied upon the Article 13(1)(b) exception to return. The Father denied the allegations. 

Ruling

Return ordered. Whilst the Mother established that there was a grave risk of harm to the child within the meaning of Article 13(1)(b), the protective measures available in Slovakia and the undertakings offered by the Father were more than sufficient to protect him.

Grounds

Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

The seriousness of the Mother’s allegations meant that, were the child to be returned to Slovakia, he would be placed at grave risk of psychological harm and put in a situation which would properly be characterised as intolerable.

However, the Court was satisfied that undertakings by the Father and the protective measures available in Slovakia would be adequate to protect the child in the mother’s care whilst decisions were made for him.