Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Instrument:

Search results (163)

  • 2018 | HC/E/CH 1537 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 |

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 5 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 12(2) 12(1)

    Synopsis

    one child wrongfully retained between age 4 and 5– National of unknown –unmarried parents – Father national of unknown – Mother national of unknown – Shared parental responsibility – Child lived in Portugal until 10 March 2017 – Application for return filed with the courts of Switzerland on 23 April 2018 – Return ordered – Main issue: Removal and Retention – The father could not prove that the mother had given her consent for the child to remain in Switzerland and the mother filed an appeal within the one year period set out in Article 12.

  • 2010 | HC/E/CA 1421 | CANADA - ONTARIO | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 16

    Synopsis

    3 children wrongfully removed at age 7 – Father national of the United Kingdom and Canada – Mother national of the United Kingdom and Canada – Both parents had rights of custody under the law of Scotland – Children lived in the United Kingdom until August 2009 – Application for return filed with the Central Authority of the Scotland on 20 October 2009 – Return ordered – Main issue(s): Rights of custody – Art. 3 – Father had rights of custody under the law of Scotland; there was no court order restricting his rights as a parent – Removal & Retention – Arts 3 and 12 – Children wrongfully removed, in breach of the father’s custody rights and without his consent. The father was exercising his rights despite the child protection investigation – Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) –There is no grave risk. Social service agencies and court in Scotland will protect the children upon their return – Undertakings – Undertakings imposed to assist the return and to protect the children in the transitional period before the court in Scotland takes over. 

  • 2013 | HC/E/IL 1300 | ISRAEL | Superior Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download HE
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Article(s)

    3 5 12 15

    Ruling

    Leave to appeal refused and return application dismissed; there had been no wrongful removal because the father did not have rights of custody at the moment of the removal.