Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Instrument:

Search results (68)

  • 1989 | HC/E/USs 206 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Sheikh v. Cahill, 145 Misc. 2d 171, 546 N.Y.S.2d 517 (Sup. Ct. 1989)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 12 13(1)(b) 13(2) 19

    Ruling

    Retention wrongful and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(2) to show that the child objected to a return had not been met.

  • 1993 | HC/E/AU 260 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Police Commissioner of South Australia v. H., 6 August 1993, transcript, Family Court of Australia (Adelaide)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 4 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered with undertakings offered; the child was habitually resident in England at the relevant date.

  • 1990 | HC/E/AU 256 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    In the Marriage of Brandon v. Brandon (1991) 14 Fam. LR 181
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 12

    Ruling

    Application for review dismissed and return ordered; the mother's removal of the child from England was wrongful as the child was habitually resident in England at the relevant date and the father was exercising his custody rights.

  • 1994 | HC/E/IL 356 | ISRAEL | Appellate Court |
    E. v. E., 20 January 1994, C.A. 6056/93, Bagatz 6860/93, The Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as a Court of Civil Appeals and as the High Court of Justice
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 4 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed; return ordered; the removal was wrongful as the father's right of custody had been breached, and none of the exceptions raised by the mother had been proved.

  • 2007 | HC/E/PA 681 | PANAMA | Superior Appellate Court |
    J. E. M. D. c. M. de J. B s / reintegro de hijo
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 4 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed, return ordered; the removal was wrongful and the grave risk of harm envisaged by Art. 13 (1)(b) was not proved.

  • 2007 | HC/E/CA 728 | CANADA | First Instance |
    Espiritu v. Bielza, [2007] O.J. No. 1587; 2007 ONCJ 175; 39 R.F.L. (6th) 218; 2007 CarswellOnt 2546
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Issues Relating to Return

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 5 13(1)(b) 14

    Ruling

    Application dismissed the removal was not deemed to have been in breach of actually exercised rights of custody.

  • 2002 | HC/E/DE 944 | GERMANY | Appellate Court |
    Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe, 2 UF 115/02, 15 November 2002
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 13(1)(b) 20 31

  • 2009 | HC/E/AT 1052 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    6Ob181/09z, Oberster Gerichtshof
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003)

    Article(s)

    4

  • 2010 | HC/E/CA 1124 | CANADA | First Instance |
    Ryan v. Ryan
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 12 13(1)(b) 16 19

    Ruling

    Retention wrongful and return ordered; Article 13(1)(b) had not been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2011 | HC/E/LV 1146 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    X. v. Latvia (Application No 27853/09)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    3 4 12 13(1)(b) 14 15 19

    Ruling

    By a majority of five to two, the European Court of Human Rights held that Latvia had violated Article 8 of the ECHR in failing to take account of various relevant factors in assessing the best interests of the child. The Court also awarded the mother compensation under Article 41 of the ECHR.

  • 2012 | HC/E/TR 1169 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    Ilker Ensar Uyanık c. Turquie (Requête No 60328/09)
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    Order

    ECrtHR - Violation of Article 8 ECHR, award of damages

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)

    Ruling

    Unanimous: infringement of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR); award of damages on the basis of Article 41 of the ECHR.

  • 2015 | HC/E/US 1343 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court
    Ortiz v. Martinez, 789 F.3d 722 (7th Cir. 2015)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    4 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return not ordered; the District Court had not erred in its finding that the appellant had sexually abused his daughter. Therefore, it had been established that the child would face a grave risk of harm if returned. 

  • 1999 | HC/E/AU 278 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Director-General, Department of Families Youth & Community Care v. Reissner [1999] FamCA 1238, (1999) 25 Fam LR 330
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Access - Art. 21

    Article(s)

    1 4 Preamble 5 7 21

    Ruling

    Access ordered; the maternal grandmother possessed rights of access pursuant to the order of the Superior Court of Arizona and those rights had been breached by the father's actions.

  • 1998 | HC/E/DK 405 | DENMARK | Appellate Court |
    V.L.K. 11. Marts 1998, afd. K, B-2717-97
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 4 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return refused; the retention of the children had been wrongful, but a grave risk of harm had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2000 | HC/E/BE 524 | BELGIUM | First Instance
    N° de rôle : 00/561/C
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    4

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the court seised was incompetent to hear the matter and in addition the Convention was not applicable.

  • 2007 | HC/E/CA 729 | CANADA | Appellate Court
    Jackson v. Graczyk, 2007 ONCA 338; [2007] O.J. No. 2035
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    No summary available
    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 12 13(1)(a)

  • 2000 | HC/E/FR 702 | FRANCE | First Instance |
    TGI Nice, 29 juin 2000, No 421/00
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 13(1)(b) 20 12(2)

  • 2001 | HC/E/CA 751 | CANADA | Appellate Court |
    Chan v. Chow (2001), 199 D.L.R. (4th) 478 (B.C.C.A.)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 5 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16 13(3)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the removal was wrongful but the standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had been proved.

  • 2006 | HC/E/FR 897 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    CA Rouen, 9 mars 2006, No de RG 05/04340
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)

  • 2011 | HC/E/UKs 1153 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    A, Petitioner [2011] CSOH 215
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 4 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 16 17 18 19

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused; Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention.