Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Instrument:

Search results (22)

  • 1995 | HC/E/UKe 120 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance
    R. v. R. (Residence Order: Child Abduction) [1995] Fam 209, [1995] 3 WLR 425
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Procedural Matters | Interpretation of the Convention

    Article(s)

    3 16 17

    Ruling

    A direction was given that the Spanish Central Authority should be informed of the facts of the case. A further direction was given that the father should be advised of his Convention rights.

  • 1998 | HC/E/AT 555 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    7Ob72/98h, Oberster Gerichtshof
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Article(s)

    3 5 13(1)(b) 17

  • 1998 | HC/E/AT 383 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    7Ob72/98h, Oberster Gerichtshof
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Article(s)

    1 3 5 12 14 17

    Ruling

    Challenge to legality dismissed; while the return proceedings were pending, the authorities in the children's State of habitual residence had granted the mother custody.

  • 2002 | HC/E/FR 512 | FRANCE | Superior Appellate Court |
    Cass Civ 1ère 19 mars 2002, N° de pourvoi 00-17.692
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12

    Article(s)

    1 3 12 16 17

    Ruling

    Challenge to legality dismissed; at the time the return application was made the retention of the child was not wrongful.

  • 2010 | HC/E/FR 1073 | FRANCE | Superior Appellate Court
    Cass Civ 1ère 8 Juillet 2010, N° de pourvoi 09-66406
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2) 17 20

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed; the Court of Appeal had duly applied the provisions of the Brussels II a Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003).

  • 2013 | HC/E/LU 1307 | LUXEMBOURG | First Instance |
    Tribunal d'arrondissement de Diekirch, 16 juillet 2013, Référé No 183/2013
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 11 12 13(2) 17

  • 2012 | HC/E/GR 1246 | GREECE | Appellate Court |
    Court of Appeal of Thessaloniki, decision 2207, 3 December 2012
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    1 3 5 11 12 13(1)(b) 14 16 17 29

    Ruling

    Appeal upheld and return refused; the retention was wrongful, but a return to the United Kingdom would expose the child to a grave risk of physical, and most importantly, psychological harm.

  • 2015 | HC/E/PL 1350 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR)
    R.S. v. Poland (Application No 63777/09)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    No summary available
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    Order

    ECrtHR - Violation of Article 8 ECHR, award of damages

    Article(s)

    3 11 17

    Synopsis

    2 children wrongfully retained at ages 6 and 10 – Married parents – Father national of Poland – Mother national of Poland – Joint custody excercised in Switzerland – Children lived in Switzerland – Application for return filed with the Central Authority of Switzerland on 24 October 2008 – Application dismissed before application to ECtHR on 1 December 2009 – Violation of Art. 8 ECHR – EUR 11,800 awarded in damages – The Polish courts had not taken into account the legitimate interests of the applicant in an adequate or fair manner in the judicial proceedings; i.a. improperly relying on a Polish interim custody order to consider the retention lawful

  • 1993 | HC/E/AU 113 | AUSTRALIA | Appellate Court |
    Murray v. Director, Family Services (1993) FLC 92-416
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Issues Relating to Return | Interpretation of the Convention

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b) 17

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been made out.

  • 1992 | HC/E/IL 357 | ISRAEL | First Instance |
    C. v. C., 25 May 1992, Tel Aviv District Court (Israel)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 17

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful since the child was both habitually resident in the United States and the father had custody rights, at the time of the removal.

  • 1998 | HC/E/CH 432 | SWITZERLAND | Appellate Court |
    Autorité de surveillance des tutelles (child protection agency), decision of 10 March 1998, 115/98
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 5 11 12 13(1)(b) 16 17 19 26

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the removal was wrongful, but Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2007 | HC/E/USf 903 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    De Silva v. Pitts, 481 F.3d 1279, (10th Cir. 2007)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(2) 17

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and non-return order confirmed; the boy objected to a return and the standard required under Article 13(2) had been reached.

  • 2011 | HC/E/UKs 1153 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    A, Petitioner [2011] CSOH 215
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 4 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 16 17 18 19

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused; Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention.

  • 2006 | HC/E/FR 714 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    CA Orléans, 27 juin 2006, No de RG 06/01084
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b) 17 19

  • 1998 | HC/E/AT 556 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    4Ob88/98i, Oberster Gerichtshof
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Interpretation of the Convention

    Article(s)

    1 3 13(1)(b) 16 17

  • 2001 | HC/E/CH 417 | SWITZERLAND | Appellate Court |
    Decision of the Cour d'appel du canton de Berne, 46/II/2001/1b, 24/07/2001
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 5 13(1)(b) 16 17 19 20 12(1) 26

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention in light of the intervening custody order made by the authorities in the State of the children's habitual residence.

  • 2001 | HC/E/USf 461 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Miller v. Miller, 240 F.3d 392 (4th Cir. 2001)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 Preamble 12 13(1)(b) 17

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful and the level of risk required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been proved.

  • 1997 | HC/E/AT 557 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    6Ob183/97y, Oberster Gerichtshof
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    2 3 13(1)(b) 17 19

  • 2012 | HC/E/US 1182 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Walker v. Walker, 701 F.3d 1110 (7th Cir. 2012)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16 | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 17

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and case remitted to the District Court; the trial court had erred in its conclusions on habitual residence, actual exercise of custody rights and consent.

  • 1995 | HC/E/UKe 171 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    R. v. R. (Residence Order: Child Abduction) [1995] Fam 209
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Procedural Matters | Interpretation of the Convention

    Article(s)

    3 16 17

    Ruling

    The court ordered that the English Central Authority inform the Spanish Central Authority of the facts of the case and that the father be advised of his rights under the Convention.