Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (1490)

  • 2017 | HC/E/CH 1591 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Case remitted to lower court

    Article(s)

    13(2) 26

    Synopsis

    One child wrongfully removed at age ten – National of Switzerland and Spain – Unmarried parents – Father national of Spain – Mother national of Switzerland – Joint custody according to Spanish law – Child lived in Spain until January/February 2016 – Application for return filed with the Central Authority of Spain on 17 February 2016 – Case remitted to lower court – Main issues: objections of the child to return – According to the mother, the child has expressed that he does not wish to return to Spain. An expert opinion that was ordered by the competent cantonal court has affirmed the child’s ability to independently form such an opinion. The father, however, invokes that the expert’s opinion was biased towards the mother and overlooked multiple factors that put the child’s maturity level as defined in 13 (2) into question.

  • 2000 | HC/E/1099 | LUXEMBOURG | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16

    Article(s)

    10 12 19

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed; the Luxembourg courts had no jurisdiction.

  • 2019 | HC/E/RU 1419 | RUSSIAN FEDERATION | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    No summary available
    Order

    ECrtHR - Violation of Article 8 ECHR, award of damages

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Synopsis

    1 child wrongfully removed at age 2 – National of Russia – Divorced parents – Mother national of Russia – Finnish court ordered joint custody and child should live with the applicant– Child lived in Finland February 2015  – Application for return filed with the Dzerzhinskiy District Court of St Petersburg, Russia, on 6 August 2015  – Return refused on appeal to St Petersburg City Court on 3 February 2016 before application to ECtHR– Violation of Art. 8 ECHR – 23 050 EUR awarded in damages – the interpretation and application of the provisions of the Hague Convention by the St Petersburg City Court failed to secure the guarantees of Article 8 and Russia failed to comply with its positive obligations under Article 8 of the Convention to secure to the applicant the right to respect for his family life.

  • 2019 | HC/E/SV 1422 | EL SALVADOR | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 5 8 12 13(1)(a) 16

    Ruling

    Appeal refused; return allowed. It was settled that the retention was wrongful.

  • 2010 | HC/E/CA 1124 | CANADA | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 12 13(1)(b) 16 19

    Ruling

    Retention wrongful and return ordered; Article 13(1)(b) had not been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2012 | HC/E/TR 1169 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    Order

    ECrtHR - Violation of Article 8 ECHR, award of damages

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)

    Ruling

    Unanimous: infringement of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR); award of damages on the basis of Article 41 of the ECHR.

  • 2011 | HC/E/PT 1167 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    Ruling

    By six votes to one, the European Court of Human Rights held that Portugal had infringed Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), but did not award damages as the father had made no claim for just satisfaction.

  • 2011 | HC/E/FR 1172 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Issues Relating to Return | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed, return ordered. The removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions raised was applicable.

  • 2010 | HC/E/FR 1164 | LUXEMBOURG | Superior Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 11 18 29

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed; the father had applied for return only in the event that he should be awarded custody of the children.

  • 2011 | HC/E/AT 1160 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal inadmissible; the appeals did not raise any substantial legal issues.

  • 2005 | HC/E/NZ 1123 | NEW ZEALAND | First Instance |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful and return ordered; the objection of one child to return was not sufficiently strong to override the policy of the Convention.

  • 2011 | HC/E/FR 1128 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered. The removal was wrongful and no exception asserted was applicable.

  • 2011 | HC/E/UKe 1174 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Article(s)

    13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and case remitted to trial court for exercise of discretion; the retention was wrongful, but the children objected to a return to Poland and were of sufficient age and maturity for their objections to be taken into account.

  • 2005 | HC/E/ZA 1054 | SOUTH AFRICA | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered subject to undertakings

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful and return ordered, subject to undertakings; a grave risk of harm had not been established to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2000 | HC/E/US 963 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(2) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; removal wrongful and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2005 | HC/E/IL 865 | ISRAEL | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed in part and application dismissed; the children were habitually resident in Israel at the date of the alleged wrongful retention. The trial court had though erred in its interpretation of the concept of acquiescence.

  • 2006 | HC/E/UKe 829 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return ordered; the trial judge had erred in exercising his discretion after having found the Article 13(2) exception to have been made out.

  • 2007 | HC/E/ZA 900 | SOUTH AFRICA | Superior Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Undertakings | Issues Relating to Return | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered subject to a mirror order being obtained in the Netherlands; the retention was wrongful and the allegation that the applicant father had consented had not been proved.

  • 2020 | HC/E/UKe 1478 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    The court dismissed the appeal and ordered the return of the children.

  • 2020 | HC/E/UKn 1479 | UNITED KINGDOM - NORTHERN IRELAND | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered subject to undertakings

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    The judge ordered the return of the child but stated that the order would not take effect until protective measures had been put in place in the Netherlands.