Case Law Search

Human Rights - Art. 20

Constitutional claims dismissed, claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act dismissed, claim of a conspiracy based on racial or other class-based animus dismissed and writ of mandamus denied.

Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

Application for leave to appeal dismissed and return ordered. More than one year had elapsed since the wrongful removal but it had not been proved that the child was settled in its new environment.

Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Procedural Matters

Return ordered; appeal on Convention issues dismissed and appeal on costs order allowed.

Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Issues Relating to Return

Appeal allowed, return ordered

Appeal allowed and return ordered; a grave risk of harm had not been established to the standard required under the Convention. The trial court had moreover erred in the exercise of its discretion.

Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

Appeal dismissed; the removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Convention, however, the return was subject to extensive and stringent conditions, including the obtaining of a mirror order in the High Court of South Africa.

Non-Convention Issues

Appeal allowed, return ordered

Appeal dismissed and return ordered; it was in the children's best interests to return and this was not prevented by UK immigration rules applicable to asylum applicants.

Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

Return refused

Removal wrongful but return refused; consent had been established in accordance with the terms of Article 13(1)(a).

Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

Appeal allowed, return refused

Appeal allowed and return refused; the child was now settled in her new environment pursuant to the terms of Article 12(2).

Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

Return refused

Return refused; the child was settled in her new environment and the court exercised its discretion not to make a return order.

Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Procedural Matters

Appeal dismissed, return refused

Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

Challenge dismissed; the Cour d'Appel had been correct in finding that none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

Return ordered

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

Return refused

Retention wrongful but return refused; the boy was habitually resident in Ireland at the time of the retention, but his objections to a return were sufficiently cogent that the trial judge exercised her discretion not to make a return order.

Procedural Matters

Appeal allowed; first instance decision overturned on procedural grounds.

Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003)

Appeal allowed, return refused

Procedural Matters

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

Return ordered

Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

Appeal allowed, return ordered

Appeal allowed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Convention.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

Appeal dismissed, return refused

Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

Appeal dismissed, application dismissed