Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Instrument:

Search results (9)

  • 2000 | HC/E/1099 | LUXEMBOURG | Appellate Court |
    Cour d'appel de Luxembourg, 3 mai 2000, Nos de rôle 24115 et 24134
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16

    Article(s)

    10 12 19

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed; the Luxembourg courts had no jurisdiction.

  • 2013 | HC/E/FR 1271 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    Raw et autres c. France (Requête No 10131/11)
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 4 7 10 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 13(3)

    Ruling

    By five to two, the ECrtHR held that France had breached Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) owing to its authorities' forbearance of the father's refusal to cooperate in execution of the return judgment. The Court also granted just satisfaction to the mother, her younger son and her daughter under Article 41 of the ECHR.

  • 2013 | HC/E/PK 1233 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Superior Appellate Court |
    A v A and another (Children: Habitual Residence) (Reunite International Child Abduction Centre intervening) [2013] UKSC 60 [2013] 3 WLR 761
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16 | Non-Convention Issues | Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003)

    Article(s)

    3 8 10 14 16

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed; the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed that English law retained a discretionary, residual basis of jurisdiction over children based on their British nationality. The case was remitted to the trial court to decide whether to exercise this jurisdiction. Were the trial court not to exercise the jurisdiction, a preliminary ruling application would be made to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to enable the Supreme Court to decide on the habitual residence of the child.

  • 2000 | HC/E/CH 436 | SWITZERLAND | First Instance |
    Bezirksgericht Hinwil (Hinwil District Court), decision of 11 December 2000, U/E/EU000008
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    1 7 10 12 13(1)(b) 13(2) 19 26

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal had been wrongful, but Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1999 | HC/E/USf 216 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Blondin v. Dubois, 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Role of the Central Authorities - Arts 6 - 10

    Article(s)

    3 8 9 10 11 12 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16 19 29

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and case remitted to the District Court to consider remedies that might allow both the return of the children to their habitual residence and their protection from harm pending a custody hearing in France.

  • 1997 | HC/E/CH 425 | SWITZERLAND | First Instance |
    U/EU970069, Bezirksgericht Zürich (Zurich District Court) (Switzerland), decision of 18 April 1997
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 4 5 6 10 14 19 12(2) 12(1) 26

    Ruling

    Return refused; the retention was not wrongful as the father had consented to the relocation of the child.

  • 2011 | HC/E/FR 1130 | FRANCE | Superior Appellate Court |
    Cass Civ 1ère, 26 octobre 2011, Nº de pourvoi 10-19.905, 1015
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    3 6 8 9 10 11 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed; the Court of Appeal had rightly found the children's retention to be wrongful and the exceptions inapplicable.

  • 2007 | HC/E/GR 680 | GREECE | First Instance |
    Court of First Instance of Amaliada (Μονομελές Πρωτοδικείο Αμαλιάδας), decision 248, 13 March 2007
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    2 3 7 10 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 13(3) 12(2) 12(1)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful, being in breach of the father's rights of custody, but the older siblings had valid objections to a return and the children would face a grave risk of harm if separated.

  • 2013 | HC/E/AR 1340 | ARGENTINA | Superior Appellate Court |
    F. C. del C. F. c/ T. R. G. s/ Reintegro de hija
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 10 11 12 13(1)(b) 30

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed; return ordered.