Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (1546)

  • 2025 | HC/E/UKe 1671 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered. 

  • 2020 | HC/E/CA 1505 | CANADA - BRITISH COLUMBIA | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    The court held that the child had been wrongfully retained in Canada and ordered her return to New Zealand.

  • 2025 | HC/E/UKe 1677 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered. Though there was a risk of harm to the child within the meaning of Article 13(1)(b), this risk could be sufficiently managed by protective measures. Furthermore, the child did not object to returning to Italy per se and that he had not attained a degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take account of his views. 

  • 2025 | HC/E/US 1669 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered.

  • 2021 | HC/E/DO 1641 | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in ES
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

  • 2025 | HC/E/CL 1653 | CHILE | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16 | Best Interests of the Child

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

  • 2025 | HC/E/CL 1652 | CHILE | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Best Interests of the Child

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

  • 2024 | HC/E/CL 1660 | CHILE | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16 | Best Interests of the Child

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

  • 2005 | HC/E/PY 1332 | ARGENTINA | Superior Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Non-Convention Issues | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed, return ordered. The removal of the child to Argentina was considered wrongful. The grave risk of harm exception envisaged in Article 11.b of the Inter-American Convention on the International Return of Children was not found to be established.

  • 1998 | HC/E/UKn 390 | UNITED KINGDOM - NORTHERN IRELAND | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 5 12 13(1)(b) 14

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful as the child was habitually resident in Ireland on the relevant date.

  • 2001 | HC/E/DE 392 | GERMANY | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 14

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the retention was wrongful as the child retained his habitual residence in Israel on the relevant date.

  • 2000 | HC/E/USf 393 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proven to the standard required.

  • 1998 | HC/E/DK 404 | DENMARK | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal allowed, application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 4 12(1)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and application dismissed; the removal was not wrongful as the child was not habitually resident in the Netherlands on the relevant date.

  • 2001 | HC/E/PT 410 | PORTUGAL | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download PT
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 5 12 13(2) 26

    Ruling

    Return ordered; none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Convention. The Australian authorities were in a position to provide for the well-being of the children, if that was required.

  • 2001 | HC/E/USf 414 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the child had not acquired a habitual residence in the other Contracting State at the date of the alleged wrongful retention.

  • 2001 | HC/E/USf 301 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed, following an alternative construction of the concept of habitual residence by the Court of Appeals, the case was remitted to the District Court for it to determine whether the United States had supplanted Israel as the locus of the children's family and social development.

  • 1997 | HC/E/US 305 | AUSTRALIA | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    18 19

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed; however the application for residence was dismissed on the merits.

  • 1999 | HC/E/USf 306 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    1 3 19

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the removal was not wrongful as the child was habitually resident in the United States on the relevant date.

  • 1995 | HC/E/DE 310 | GERMANY |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Human Rights - Art. 20

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the Convention conforms with the German Constitution and does not infringe any basic rights.

  • 1995 | HC/E/AU 280 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    2 3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the retention of the children was wrongful and the standard required under the various exceptions raised had not been met.